Judgments - INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860
SANTOSH S/O ADINATH GHALAGE AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
Madhavan & Ors Versus The State of Tamil Nadu
Notably, the High Court has not considered the issue of quantum of sentence at all, but mechanically proceeded to affirm the sentence awarded by the Trial Court. From the factual position, which has emerged from the record, it is noticed that there was a pre-existing property dispute between the two families. The incident in question happened all of a sudden without any premeditation after PW1 questioned the appellants about their behavior. It was a free fight between the two family Full Judgment
KRISHNA S/O RAMRAO RIDDE Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Roop Narayan Sahu -Versus- State of M.P. & others
SANJAY S/O BHIMRAO DAHAKE Vs THE STATE OF MAH.THR.PSO.CHANDRAPUR
SOHAIL ABDUL RASHID SHAIKH Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
SHAKIR ABDUL LATIF Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
SURAJPRASAD @ RAJKUMAR S/O SHIVCHARAN ROY (IN JAIL) Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH P.S.O. P.S. GHUGGUS, CHANDRAPUR
SYED IQBAL SYED AZIZ Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PSO PARATWADA TQ ACHALPUR DISTT AMRAVATI
JAWAHARLAL RAMTIRTH SHARMA Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
Rishabh Saxena -Vs.- State of Madhya Pradesh
EJJADUR RAHMAN AND ANR VS THE STATE OF ASSAM
Shankarlal & Another Versus State of Madhya Pradesh
State through Central Bureau of Investigation Versus Dr. Anup Kumar Srivastava
Framing of charge is the first major step in a criminal trial where the court is expected to apply its mind to the entire record and documents placed therewith before the court. Taking cognizance of an offence has been stated to necessitate an application of mind by the court but framing of charge is a major event where the court considers the possibility of discharging the accused of the offence with which he is charged or requiring the accused to face trial. There are different categories Full Judgment