Judgments - INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860
Vijayh Singh @ Vijay Kumar Versus State of Madhya Pradesh
Devi Singh Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - In a case of circumstantial evidence the prosecution has to establish that there must be a chain of evidence so complete as not to leave any reasonable ground for conclusion consistent with the innocence of the accused and must show that in all human probability the act must have been done by the accused. Full Judgment
Bhure Singh and Anr. Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - Applicability of Section 34 of IPC. Full Judgment
Latesh @ Dadu Baburao Karlekar Versus The State of Maharashtra
Mst. Anusuiya @ Saraswatibai & Anr. VERSUS State of Madhya Pradesh
Subhash Chander Bansal Versus Gian Chand and Ors.
Istfaq Mohammad Vs. State of M.P. & others
Chingu @ Sohanlal and Ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Ramadhar @ Daddi Kachhi Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - (I) If, in presence of the accused at his house something wrong has happened with his wife, then in view of Section 106 of the Evidence Act, he is under burden to give a cogent explanation as to how the crime was committed. (II) Conviction can be based on circumstantial evidence. Full Judgment
LACHHMAN DASS VERSUS RESHAM CHAND KALER AND ANR
ISSAC @ KISHOR VERSUS RONALD CHERIYAN AND ORS.
Vikram Singh Paur Late Shri Tukoji Rao Paur Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Kripal Singh Vs. State of M.P.
Law laid down - Evidence of the prosecutrix is similar to evidence of the injured-complainant or witness. The testimony of the prosecutrix if found to be reliable, per se, may be sufficient to convict a culprit and no corroboration of her evidence is necessary. In prosecution of rape, law does not require corroboration. Absence of injury – external or internal, on the body of the prosecutrix would not render the testimony of the prosecutrix unreliable. Full Judgment
ATUL THAKUR VERSUS STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ETC.
Khemchand Kachhi Patel Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - Admissibility of statement tendered by an accused to the police – Extra-judicial confession, admissibility of the evidence of statement under Section 6 of the Evidence Act, res gestae. Full Judgment
Guddu & Durga Shankar Yadav & others Vs. The State of M.P.
Law laid down - To substantiate a charge under Section 302 with the aid of Section 34, it must be shown that the criminal act complained against was done by one of the accused persons in furtherance of the common intention of the both. Common intention has to be distinguished from same or similar intention. Full Judgment
Dharmendra Jadon vs. State of M.P.
Shrawan vs. State of M.P.
Law Laid down - 1. The conviction can be based on the testimony of child witness. 2. Even if, the witness turned hostile, it would not affect the case, if there is other evidence on record to prove the prosecution case Full Judgment