Judgments - INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860
Jagdish Valecha Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors.
S.N. Vijaywargiya Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Law Laid Down - In terms of Section 170(1) of the CrPC, the Investigating Agency is mandated to produce an accused in custody for the non-bailable offence. The argument that the Court should have issued summons in respect of such offence stands rejected. An order dated 20.10.2016 of a Single Bench of this Court in MCRC No.17501/2016 (Rajendra Kori vs. State of Madhya Pradesh) - is overruled. Accused has no right to insist upon investigation by a particular agency – whether State Full Judgment
State of M.P. Vs. Natwar and others
NARESH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF DELHI
Nitin Singhal Vs. Purushottam Chugh & Another
MAHESH KUMAR Vs. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS
DALIP SINGH Vs. STATE
Bhagchandra Vs State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - (i) Evidence of related eye-witnesses can be relied upon for conviction. (ii) Non-compliance of Section 157 of Cr.P.C. cannot prove fatal for the prosecution if the case is duly established against the accused. (iii) Keeping in view the heinous and brutal nature of murder of more than one person, now-a-days death sentence is essential. Full Judgment
SHIVA @ UWAN & ORS. Vs. STATE
Dinesh s/o Ram Kishore Vyas Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh
Law Laid Down - Generally, the police is blamed for delay and indifferent manner but if the police officials have acted in the manner, which is expected of them, it cannot be said that the appellant has been falsely implicated. Full Judgment
JOSEPH Versus THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU
N.M. Shrivastava Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Law Laid Down - Criminal proceedings initiated against the petitioners are not for violating the orders passed by the Supreme Court but as a factor to determine conspiracy in scheduling the second counselling for the extended period and permitting the candidates to be admitted on the last date. Thus, fixing of schedule by the petitioners cannot be an honest and bona fide exercise of administrative action but it is shaded with suspicion as it was not modified even when their attention Full Judgment
Dr. Vijay Kumar Pandya Vs. Union of India through CBI
Law Laid Down - Grant of anticipatory bail is to be considered in view of the grave accusation levelled against the accused and therefore, may be one of the petitioner is a senior citizen aged 70 years and suffering ailments, would not entitle him to concession of anticipatory bail. The modus operandi and gravity of accusation involving same crime number and almost similar allegations, as discussed in detail in the order passed in MCRC No.24600/2017 (Dr. Divya Kishore Satpathi vs. CBI) and connected Full Judgment
Dr. Divya Kishore Satpathi Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Law Laid Down - The action or inaction of the petitioners, who were running the medical colleges has denied admission to the large number of more meritorious candidates, who were, in fact, entitled to admission and thus, leading to their frustration. The entire process would be antithesis of the rule that the students should be admitted only on merit. The petitioners may not be an accused of taking life of a person but if the allegations are proved, they cannot commit more Full Judgment