Judgments - INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860
Chandra Bhawan Singh VERSUS The State of Uttar Pradesh
State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Akash Barediya
OSAMA AZIZ AND ANR :Versus: STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS.
NISHAN SINGH & ORS :Versus: ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. THROUGH REGIONAL MANAGER & ORS
Smt. Kamla Yadav and Others vs. State of MP and Another
BHASKARRAO & ORS VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Naresh & Ors. Versus The State of Uttarakhand & Ors.
Rakesh Kumar and Others vs. State of MP and Anr.
Monu @ Saurabh Kumar Chaturvedi Vs. State of M.P. & Anr.
Law Laid Down - The offence under the unamended provision of Sec. 3(1)(x) of the 1989 Act – The victim is Project Officer – The insult and intimidation was directed against the Project Officer arising out of victim's resistence in allowing joining of sister-in- law of the accused- Insult and intimidation was directed against the Project Officer and not against the SC / ST status / capacity of the Project Officer- Thus offence u/s 3(1) (x) not made out even on Full Judgment
Mahavir Prasad Rathore vs Lachchhi Ram Patel And Ors
Laxman & Another Vs. State of M.P.
Law laid down - Whether Extra Judicial Confession given to interested witness can be relied on ingredients of last seen evidence and effect of delay in giving statements. Full Judgment
MANISH SHARMA @ PAPPAN Vs. THE STATE NCT OF DELHI
Kanchedilal Thakur Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - Whether corroboration of the statement of evidence of police person is necessary or not and whether the conviction can be based on the statement of witness/witnesses recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. when the witness denied the contents of statement under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. in their deposition recorded before the Court during Trial. Full Judgment
Madhur Vs. State of M.P.
Law laid down - (1) The word ‘suitable’ does not require a definition because any man of experience would know who is suitable. However, each case has to be viewed in the context in which the word ‘suitability’ or ‘suitable’ is used i.e. the object of the enactment & the purpose sought to be achieved. (2) ‘Eligibility’ is a matter of fact whereas ‘suitability’ is a matter of opinion. (3) M.P. Civil Services (General Conditions of Service) Rules, 1961- when Competent Authority has Full Judgment
Navaneethakrishnan Versus The State by Inspector of Police
Navaneethakrishnan Versus The State by Inspector of Police Full Judgment