Filter by Date
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

MOTIRAM PADU JOSHI AND OTHERS Versus THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Appeal (Crl.), 1479 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 10, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Murder
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Suraj Nath & Others Suraj Nath

Criminal Appeal, 1275 of 2006, Judgment Date: Jul 09, 2018

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

LALIT YADAV VS. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Special Leave Petition (Crl.), 18436 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 05, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Rape
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

HANSARAM VERSUS THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Appeal (Crl.), 341 of 2018, Judgment Date: Jul 04, 2018

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Prabhu Dayal Versus The State of Rajasthan

Appeal (Crl.), 2324 of 2014, Judgment Date: Jul 04, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Sanjay Bhadoriya vs. State of MP

MCRC, .22796 of 2018, Judgment Date: Jul 04, 2018

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH VERSUS PULLAGUMMI KASI REDDY KRISHNA REDDY @ RAMA KRISHNA REDDY & ORS.

Appeal (Crl.), 2089-2090 of 2018, Judgment Date: Jul 03, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Murder
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

DEVIDAS LOKA RATHOD VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Appeal (Crl.), 814 of 2017, Judgment Date: Jul 02, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Murder
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SONVIR @ SOMVIR VERSUS THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

Appeal (Crl.), 958 of 2017, Judgment Date: Jul 02, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Patru S/o Kapura Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Criminal Appeal, 600 of 2000, Judgment Date: Jun 29, 2018

Law laid down - In this case, Bharosa was injured on 8.8.1998 and was medically examined on same day and his x-ray examination was conducted on 10.8.1998 and in his M.L.C. and x-ray report, there was no indication about any grievous injury received by him and during treatment he died on 28.8.1998 and according to unchallenged evidence of autopsy surgeon, Bharosa died of failure of surgical operation and due to perforation peritonitis as a result of blunt injury to abdomen and its Full Judgment

Tags Murder
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Jaheeruddin vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

MCRC, 18613 of 2018, Judgment Date: Jun 28, 2018

Law Laid Down -  Bail u/s. 438/439 of Cr.P.C. - Article 51-A of the Constitution of India - emphasis made on the compliance of fundamental duties. Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Sardar Singh & Ors. Versus State of M.P.

CRR, 156 of 2009, Judgment Date: Jun 25, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Bail
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Lalji Chaudhary Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh

MCRC, 18356 of 2018, Judgment Date: Jun 21, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Bail Rape
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

M/S. COTT BEVERAGES INC. (ROYAL CROWN COLA INTERNATIONAL DIVISION) USA AND THREE OTHERS Vs. M/S. TRISTAR BEVERAGES PVT. LTD., INDORE

MCRC, 6624 of 2016, Judgment Date: Jun 18, 2018

Law laid down - The criminal proceedings manifestly attended with malafide and/or where the proceeding is maliciously instituted with ulterior motive for wreaking vengeance on the accused and turning a civil litigation into a criminal litigation, deserves to be quashed. Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Gyanchand Jain Vs. State of Madhya Prdesh

Criminal Revision, 404 of 2017, Judgment Date: Jun 18, 2018

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

JAYASWAMY VERSUS STATE OF KARNATAKA

Appeal (Crl.), 1022 of 2011, Judgment Date: Jun 01, 2018

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

State of M.P. Vs. Latoori Vs. Ors.

Criminal Appeal, 139 of 2000, Judgment Date: May 28, 2018

Law Laid Down - 1. Mere relationship of the witnesses to the deceased do not per se render them partisan, especially when the version of eye-witness otherwise inspires confidence despite minor contradictions, embellishments and omissions. 2. Detailed graphic and elaborate disclosure of the incident is not per se an indication of witness being tutored or the prosecution story being manufactured. Full Judgment

Tags Appeal
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Lallu alias Dashrath Baghel Vs. State of MP.

Criminal Appeal, 236 of 2006, Judgment Date: May 28, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Appeal
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Munshilal Vs. State of M.P.

Criminal Appeal, 770 of 2005, Judgment Date: May 23, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Murder
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Raghuveer Singh and Others Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Criminal Appeal, 35 of 2007, Judgment Date: May 18, 2018

Law laid down - (1) Where witnesses make inconsistent statements in their evidence either at one stage or at two stages, testimony of such witnesses become unreliable and unworthy of credence and in absence of special circumstances, no conviction can be based on the evidence of such witnesses. (2) Material improvements of version of eye-witness from FIR to the version given in the Court, said evidence cannot be taken into consideration.  (3) Failure on part of investigating agency to recover any bloodstained Full Judgment

Tags Bail