Judgments - INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860
Hakamsingh and another Versus State of M.P.
State of Haryana Versus Rajesh Aggarwal & Anr.
HARADHAN BHOWMIK Vs. THE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI
State of Madhya Pradesh Versus Sheikh Sadik
Law Laid Down: The presumption of correctness of date of birth in the matriculation certificate cannot be disputed on the basis of approximate age given by the doctor who medico-legally examined the victim - Supreme Court decision reported as (2013) 7 SCC 263 (Jarnail Singh vs. State of Haryana) - followed. The prosecutrix was staying in the house of the accused, who were providing her education, food, clothes and residence as her parents could not pay the fee of the school. Under Full Judgment
YOGESH GUPTA Vs. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
JITENDER SINGH Vs. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
Sunil Adiwasi Vs. State of M.P.
JAGMOHAN @ JAGGU Vs. THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
ANKIT RATHORE & ORS. Vs. STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.
JOGINDER SINGH BOTE & ORS. Vs. NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
ABHISHEK JAIN & ORS. Vs. STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.
Imtiyaz Ramzan Khan Versus State of Maharashtra
Arvind Tiwary Versus State of Bihar and Another
SAJID VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ANOTHER
Vinod alias Rahul Chouhtha - V/s - State of Madhya Pradesh P.S. Kotwali, Shahdol (M.P.)
Law Laid Down: The opinion of an expert is admissible in evidence u/S 293 of the CrPC and therefore, cannot be discarded on the basis of books on Medical Jurisprudence unless the passages which are sought to be discredited in the opinion of the expert are put to him - Judgments relied - AIR 1975 SC 905 (Phool Kumar vs. Delhi Administration) and AIR 1957 SC 589 (Bhagwan Das and another vs. State of Rajasthan). A DNA report must be accepted as scientifically Full Judgment