Judgments - INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860
Prabhu Dayal Versus The State of Rajasthan
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH VERSUS PULLAGUMMI KASI REDDY KRISHNA REDDY @ RAMA KRISHNA REDDY & ORS.
DEVIDAS LOKA RATHOD VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
SONVIR @ SOMVIR VERSUS THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
Patru S/o Kapura Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - In this case, Bharosa was injured on 8.8.1998 and was medically examined on same day and his x-ray examination was conducted on 10.8.1998 and in his M.L.C. and x-ray report, there was no indication about any grievous injury received by him and during treatment he died on 28.8.1998 and according to unchallenged evidence of autopsy surgeon, Bharosa died of failure of surgical operation and due to perforation peritonitis as a result of blunt injury to abdomen and its Full Judgment
Jaheeruddin vs The State of Madhya Pradesh
Law Laid Down - Bail u/s. 438/439 of Cr.P.C. - Article 51-A of the Constitution of India - emphasis made on the compliance of fundamental duties. Full Judgment
Lalji Chaudhary Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh
M/S. COTT BEVERAGES INC. (ROYAL CROWN COLA INTERNATIONAL DIVISION) USA AND THREE OTHERS Vs. M/S. TRISTAR BEVERAGES PVT. LTD., INDORE
Law laid down - The criminal proceedings manifestly attended with malafide and/or where the proceeding is maliciously instituted with ulterior motive for wreaking vengeance on the accused and turning a civil litigation into a criminal litigation, deserves to be quashed. Full Judgment
Gyanchand Jain Vs. State of Madhya Prdesh
State of M.P. Vs. Latoori Vs. Ors.
Law Laid Down - 1. Mere relationship of the witnesses to the deceased do not per se render them partisan, especially when the version of eye-witness otherwise inspires confidence despite minor contradictions, embellishments and omissions. 2. Detailed graphic and elaborate disclosure of the incident is not per se an indication of witness being tutored or the prosecution story being manufactured. Full Judgment
Lallu alias Dashrath Baghel Vs. State of MP.
Raghuveer Singh and Others Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - (1) Where witnesses make inconsistent statements in their evidence either at one stage or at two stages, testimony of such witnesses become unreliable and unworthy of credence and in absence of special circumstances, no conviction can be based on the evidence of such witnesses. (2) Material improvements of version of eye-witness from FIR to the version given in the Court, said evidence cannot be taken into consideration. (3) Failure on part of investigating agency to recover any bloodstained Full Judgment