Judgments - INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860
Gajanand S/o Chamru Lal @ Bhuria Lohar Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - An act of attempt to commit an offence is totally different from an act of preparation to commit an offence. There is no evidence that after laying down on the prosecutrix, the appellant in order to commit rape put his penis on the vagina of the prosecutrix or made any further attempt to penetrate in the vagina of the prosecutrix or touch any sensual organ with hand. Hence, the act which has been proved shows only preparation. Moreso, Full Judgment
DOLA @ DOLAGOBINDA PRADHAN & ANR. VERSUS THE STATE OF ODISHA
RAKESH Vs. THE STATE OF DELHI
State of Uttar Pradesh VERSUS Anil Kumar @ Badka & Ors.
Menoka Malik and others Versus The State of West Bengal and others
Ajay Batham and another Vs. State of M.P. and another
Lakshmi Chand and another versus State of Uttar Pradesh
DHARMENDER Vs. THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)
Liyakatuddin Versus State of M.P
Hakamsingh and another Versus State of M.P.
State of Haryana Versus Rajesh Aggarwal & Anr.
HARADHAN BHOWMIK Vs. THE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI
State of Madhya Pradesh Versus Sheikh Sadik
Law Laid Down: The presumption of correctness of date of birth in the matriculation certificate cannot be disputed on the basis of approximate age given by the doctor who medico-legally examined the victim - Supreme Court decision reported as (2013) 7 SCC 263 (Jarnail Singh vs. State of Haryana) - followed. The prosecutrix was staying in the house of the accused, who were providing her education, food, clothes and residence as her parents could not pay the fee of the school. Under Full Judgment