Judgments - INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860
Vimla Devi & Ors. VERSUSNational Insurance CompanyLimited & Ors.
Somdatt Mishra Vs. The State of M.P. & Another
Law Laid down - 1- When a complainant is restrained by the public authority to commit any illegal act and with motive to overcome such situation, any complaint under section 354 of IPC or like nature has been filed against the public servant, then it is the duty of the Investigating Officer to investigate thoroughly and reach to the motive if any exist, for which the complaint has been filed against the public servant. 2- Harassment of the public servant on pretext Full Judgment
RAJENDRA SINGH AND ANR. Vs. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANR.
Law Laid down - 1. Sec. 53-A and Sec. 164-A inserted in the Cr.P.C by way of Amendment Act 2005 which makes the DNA profiling of accused and victim must, is a step towards more Forensic and Scientific Investigation. Therefore, if the DNA report is supported by medical evidence, wherein injuries to the prosecutrix are not sustained over the private parts or over her person and attending circumstances, do not corroborate in any manner, then false implication of the accused can Full Judgment
Anil Vanshkar Vs. State of M.P. and Another
Law laid down - (I) Considering the amendment vide Section 439(1-A) of Cr.P.C. on the touch stone of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, it appears that personal liberty of an individual cannot lie at the mercy of presence of an “Informant”. (II) Code of Criminal Procedure is a procedural law and by the amendment incorporated under Section 439(1-A) of Cr.P.C. impliedly penalises the applicant/ accused while withholding his bail application for an indefinite period which is not permissible in law. (III) Full Judgment
State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Mohammad Shahid & Another
Law Laid Down - Evidence as to the cause of death is relevant not only in relation to the cause of death of the person making the statement but also to the circumstances of the transaction which resulted in death. In the suicide note when the prosecutrix has tried to convey that the accused were hungry (for sex) and that she became their food (victim), it clearly indicates that she was violated and that she did not want to live life of Full Judgment
REENA HAZARIKA VERSUS STATE OF ASSAM
KAMIL VERSUS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
Mukhtyar Jabbar Tadvi Versus State of Maharashtra
Goutam Singh Karoliya and another Vs. State of M.P. and another
STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) VERSUS PANKAJ CHAUDHARY AND ORS.
Touheed Musalman Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - It is not appropriate to award ‘death sentence’ in every case. To award death sentence, some factors are necessary to be considered, such as the age of culprit, manner of commission of offence and possibilities of reformation of accused, etc. Full Judgment
RAMVIR VERSUS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
Raj Kumar Kol Versus State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid dow - Fingering into the vagina would be a rape within the definition of rape under Section 375 of IPC as substituted by Act No.13 of 2013 w.e.f. 03-02-2013. Taking into consideration the totality of the facts, nature, motive and the manner of the offence, capital punishment is commuted to the Rigorous imprisonment for a period of 20 years and fine of Rs.10,000/-. Full Judgment