Judgments - INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860
Lal Singh -Versus- The State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - In case of rape of an adult married woman where the report is lodged on the next day of the incident, the prosecution has to explain where did the prosecutrix stay in the night. In absence of such an explanation, medical and chemical examination reports lose their significance. Full Judgment
Jan Mohamad VERSUS State of Haryana
State of Madhya Pradesh Versus Mukesh Kewat and another
Rajendra Pralhadrao Wasnik Versus State of Maharashtra
NIPUN SAXENA & ANR Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VERSUS WASIF HAIDER ETC
Mayank Sharma & Ors. vs. State of M.P. & Anr.
Viran Gyanlal Rajput Versus The State of Maharashtra
State of Madhya Pradesh Versus Bhagwan s/o Ballu Nahal
Mohd. Akhtar @ Kari & Ors. Versus State of Bihar & Anr
Kanubhai Bhagvanbhai Nayak VERSUS State of Gujarat
Smt. Pooja Parihar Vs. State of M.P. and others
Boodhe @ Roop Singh Vs. The State of M.P.
Law laid down - The Evidence Act nowhere says that evidence of the prosecutrix cannot be accepted unless it is corroborated by any material particulars. The requirement of material for corroboration depends on the facts and circumstances of each case applying the rule of prudence. But if the prosecutrix is an adult and of full understanding the court is entitled to base a conviction on her evidence unless the same is shown to be infirm and not trustworthy. If the totality of the circumstances appearing on Full Judgment
ASHWANI KUMAR & ANR. VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB
NARAYAN MALHARI THORAT VERSUS VINAYAK DEORAO BHAGAT AND ANR
CHHANNU LAL VERMA VERSUS THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
PALANI VERSUS STATE OF TAMIL NADU
RAMJI VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB
Rakesh Rathore & Another vs. State of MP & Anr
Suresh Singh Bhadoria Versus Central Bureau of Investigtion
Law laid down - In terms of Section 170(1) of CrPC, the investigating agency is mandated to produce an accused into custody for the non-bailable offence. The argument that the Court should have issued summons in respect of such offence, cannot be accepted. Inherent power of judicial review under Section 482 of CrPC presupposes that the Court is required to see whether the trial Court has abused the process of law or it is necessary to annul the proceedings for securing the Full Judgment