Judgments - INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860
State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Mohammad Shahid & Another
Law Laid Down - Evidence as to the cause of death is relevant not only in relation to the cause of death of the person making the statement but also to the circumstances of the transaction which resulted in death. In the suicide note when the prosecutrix has tried to convey that the accused were hungry (for sex) and that she became their food (victim), it clearly indicates that she was violated and that she did not want to live life of Full Judgment
REENA HAZARIKA VERSUS STATE OF ASSAM
KAMIL VERSUS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
Mukhtyar Jabbar Tadvi Versus State of Maharashtra
Goutam Singh Karoliya and another Vs. State of M.P. and another
STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) VERSUS PANKAJ CHAUDHARY AND ORS.
Touheed Musalman Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - It is not appropriate to award ‘death sentence’ in every case. To award death sentence, some factors are necessary to be considered, such as the age of culprit, manner of commission of offence and possibilities of reformation of accused, etc. Full Judgment
RAMVIR VERSUS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
Raj Kumar Kol Versus State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid dow - Fingering into the vagina would be a rape within the definition of rape under Section 375 of IPC as substituted by Act No.13 of 2013 w.e.f. 03-02-2013. Taking into consideration the totality of the facts, nature, motive and the manner of the offence, capital punishment is commuted to the Rigorous imprisonment for a period of 20 years and fine of Rs.10,000/-. Full Judgment
JITENDRA @ KALLA VERSUS STATE OF GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
Asar Mohammad and Ors. :Versus: The State of U.P
RAJENDRA SINGH VERSUS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
MOHAMMED IMRAN VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Taranjeet Singh Hora & Anr. Vs. State of M.P.
Law laid down - [1] After registration of the first FIR the subsequent FIR for offence committed in the course of same transaction or offence arising as a consequence of prior offence, is not permissible and the subsequent complaint in such cases applying the test of “sameness” and “consequence” can be treated as statement under Section 161(3) of the Cr.P.C. in the FIR already registered but if the subsequent complaint is in regard to same incident but filed as a counter Full Judgment
State of Madhya Pradesh Versus Rajesh Singh
Law laid down - Penetration is sufficient to constitute sexual intercourse for offence of rape. Complete penetration is not essential. Full Judgment