Judgments - INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860
NIPUN SAXENA & ANR Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VERSUS WASIF HAIDER ETC
Mayank Sharma & Ors. vs. State of M.P. & Anr.
Viran Gyanlal Rajput Versus The State of Maharashtra
State of Madhya Pradesh Versus Bhagwan s/o Ballu Nahal
Mohd. Akhtar @ Kari & Ors. Versus State of Bihar & Anr
Kanubhai Bhagvanbhai Nayak VERSUS State of Gujarat
Smt. Pooja Parihar Vs. State of M.P. and others
Boodhe @ Roop Singh Vs. The State of M.P.
Law laid down - The Evidence Act nowhere says that evidence of the prosecutrix cannot be accepted unless it is corroborated by any material particulars. The requirement of material for corroboration depends on the facts and circumstances of each case applying the rule of prudence. But if the prosecutrix is an adult and of full understanding the court is entitled to base a conviction on her evidence unless the same is shown to be infirm and not trustworthy. If the totality of the circumstances appearing on Full Judgment
ASHWANI KUMAR & ANR. VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB
NARAYAN MALHARI THORAT VERSUS VINAYAK DEORAO BHAGAT AND ANR
CHHANNU LAL VERMA VERSUS THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
PALANI VERSUS STATE OF TAMIL NADU
RAMJI VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB
Rakesh Rathore & Another vs. State of MP & Anr
Suresh Singh Bhadoria Versus Central Bureau of Investigtion
Law laid down - In terms of Section 170(1) of CrPC, the investigating agency is mandated to produce an accused into custody for the non-bailable offence. The argument that the Court should have issued summons in respect of such offence, cannot be accepted. Inherent power of judicial review under Section 482 of CrPC presupposes that the Court is required to see whether the trial Court has abused the process of law or it is necessary to annul the proceedings for securing the Full Judgment
Vimla Devi & Ors. VERSUSNational Insurance CompanyLimited & Ors.
Somdatt Mishra Vs. The State of M.P. & Another
Law Laid down - 1- When a complainant is restrained by the public authority to commit any illegal act and with motive to overcome such situation, any complaint under section 354 of IPC or like nature has been filed against the public servant, then it is the duty of the Investigating Officer to investigate thoroughly and reach to the motive if any exist, for which the complaint has been filed against the public servant. 2- Harassment of the public servant on pretext Full Judgment
RAJENDRA SINGH AND ANR. Vs. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANR.
Law Laid down - 1. Sec. 53-A and Sec. 164-A inserted in the Cr.P.C by way of Amendment Act 2005 which makes the DNA profiling of accused and victim must, is a step towards more Forensic and Scientific Investigation. Therefore, if the DNA report is supported by medical evidence, wherein injuries to the prosecutrix are not sustained over the private parts or over her person and attending circumstances, do not corroborate in any manner, then false implication of the accused can Full Judgment
Anil Vanshkar Vs. State of M.P. and Another
Law laid down - (I) Considering the amendment vide Section 439(1-A) of Cr.P.C. on the touch stone of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, it appears that personal liberty of an individual cannot lie at the mercy of presence of an “Informant”. (II) Code of Criminal Procedure is a procedural law and by the amendment incorporated under Section 439(1-A) of Cr.P.C. impliedly penalises the applicant/ accused while withholding his bail application for an indefinite period which is not permissible in law. (III) Full Judgment