Filter by Date
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

RAJIV BAJAJ VERSUS STATE AND ORS

CRL.M.C., 279 of 2019, Judgment Date: Oct 17, 2019

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

RAM CHARAN & ORS VERSUS STATE & ANR

CRL.M.C., 5302 of 2019, Judgment Date: Oct 17, 2019

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

SHYAM SUNDER VERSUS STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

BAIL APPLN., 1900 of 2019, Judgment Date: Oct 17, 2019

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

Vinubhai Haribhai Malaviya and Ors. Versus The State of Gujarat and Anr.

Appeal (Crl.), 478-479 of 2017, Judgment Date: Oct 16, 2019

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

BUNTY BUSWALA & ORS VERSUS STATE & ANR

W.P.(CRL), 2284 of 2019, Judgment Date: Oct 16, 2019

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

SATISH VERSUS STATE

W.P.(CRL), 2400 of 2019, Judgment Date: Oct 16, 2019

Full Judgment

Tags Punishment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Vimlendra Singh alias Prince Singh Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh

CRA, 3580 of 2014, Judgment Date: Oct 16, 2019

Law laid down - 1. Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989– As per unamended provision, the prosecution was required to establish that the prosecutrix who was subjected to any offence under the IPC was subjected on the ground that she is a member of SC/ST community. In view of evidence on record, the prosecution could not establish that offence allegedly committed was on the ground that prosecutrix belonged to reserved community. Hence, Full Judgment

Tags Rape
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Ajay Tiwari Vs. State of M.P.

CRA, 1330 of 2008, Judgment Date: Oct 16, 2019

Law laid down - 1. Evidence Act- ‘Related’ and “Interested” Witness” - ‘related’ is not equivalent into ‘interested’. A witness may be called ‘interested’ only when he derives some benefits from the result of the litigation or in seeing the accused person punished. Thus, there is no hard and fast rule that evidence of interested witness cannot be taken into consideration. The Court is obliged to examine such evidence with great care, caution and circumspection. 2. ‘Related’ and ‘interested’ witness – The Full Judgment

Tags Murder
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

AJAY JERATH & ANR VERSUS STATE

BAIL APPLN., 1998 of 2018, Judgment Date: Oct 14, 2019

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

ASHOK SOLANKI VERSUS STATE & ANR

CRL.M.C., 5212 of 2019, Judgment Date: Oct 14, 2019

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

NAMIT KUMAR VERSUS STATE & ANR

CRL.M.C., 5206 of 2019, Judgment Date: Oct 14, 2019

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

NAVEEN KOTIYA VERSUS STATE

BAIL APPLN., 360 of 2019, Judgment Date: Oct 14, 2019

Full Judgment

Tags Bail
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

RAJU KUMAR GAUR alias RAJIV PRASAD VERSUS STATE

CRL.A., 746 of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 14, 2019

Full Judgment

Tags Appeal
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

Abhishek Kumar Versus The State of Delhi

BAIL APPLN., 1913 of 2019, Judgment Date: Oct 11, 2019

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

Kamal Kishore @ Lalaji Versus The State of Delhi

BAIL APPLN., 1006 of 2019, Judgment Date: Oct 11, 2019

Full Judgment

Tags Bail
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

PAWAN KUMAR VERSUS STATE & ANR

CRL.REV.P., 727 of 2016, Judgment Date: Oct 10, 2019

Full Judgment

Tags Revision
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

FAINUL KHAN VERSUS STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ANOTHER

Special Leave Petition (Civil), 937 of 2011, Judgment Date: Oct 04, 2019

Full Judgment

Tags Murder
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

THE STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH Versus RAMCHANDRA RABIDAS @ RATAN RABIDAS & ANR.

Appeal (Crl.), 905 of 2010, Judgment Date: Oct 04, 2019

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Kantilal Versus The State of Gujarat

Appeal (Crl.), 1519 of 2019, Judgment Date: Oct 04, 2019

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M. RAMALINGAM VERSUS STATE REPRESENTED BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE SBE/CBI/ACB, MADRAS

Special Leave Petition (Civil), 1949 of 2009, Judgment Date: Oct 03, 2019

Full Judgment