Judgments - INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872
Aftab Khan Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Ashish @ Banti Sen Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - The evidence of injured eye-witness has great evidentiary value. Conviction can be based on the testimony of related eye-witnesses. Full Judgment
STATE OF M.P. Vs. Munna @ Shahnwaj
Smt. Megha Singh Sindhe Vs. State of M.P. & Anr.
Law Laid Down - 1. Vague, unspecific and sweeping allegations of cruelty against the sister-in-law (Nanad) who was residing elsewhere are insufficient to sustain a charge-sheet u/S. 304-B of IPC in the absence of any other cogent and compelling evidence pointing towards subjection of prosecutrix to dowry demand related cruelty. Full Judgment
Kuldeep Singh Tomar vs. State of M.P.
Chatur Singh & Another Vs. State of MP
Rajesh Kushwah Vs. State of M.P.
Dr. Ashish Khare Vs. State of M.P. and another
Ramadhar @ Daddi Kachhi Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - (I) If, in presence of the accused at his house something wrong has happened with his wife, then in view of Section 106 of the Evidence Act, he is under burden to give a cogent explanation as to how the crime was committed. (II) Conviction can be based on circumstantial evidence. Full Judgment
Vikram Singh Paur Late Shri Tukoji Rao Paur Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Khemchand Kachhi Patel Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - Admissibility of statement tendered by an accused to the police – Extra-judicial confession, admissibility of the evidence of statement under Section 6 of the Evidence Act, res gestae. Full Judgment
Shrawan vs. State of M.P.
Law Laid down - 1. The conviction can be based on the testimony of child witness. 2. Even if, the witness turned hostile, it would not affect the case, if there is other evidence on record to prove the prosecution case Full Judgment
Caparo Engineering India Ltd Vs. Pradhanmantri Engineering Shramik Sanghthan
Prasanna Kumar and another Versus State of M.P.
Law laid down - None explanation of injuries to the accused or to the deceased with a particular weapon is not always fatal, if there is specific ocular evidence. Section 149 of IPC makes every member of an unlawful assembly at the time of committing the offence guilty of that offence on the principle of constructive liability. In the case of inconsistency between medical evidence and ocular evidence priority has to be given to ocular evidence ignoring the minor discrepancies. Full Judgment
Gappe alias Vimlesh Vs State of M.P.
State of M.P. Vs. Raju alias Rajendra Singh & Ors.
Smt.Bayanabai Kaware VERSUS Rajendra S/o Baburao Dhote
Vinay Vs State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - (i) Conviction can be based upon the evidence of child witness and circumstantial evidence. (ii) DNA analysis report can be considered for holding the accused guilty. Full Judgment