Judgments - INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872
State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Mohammad Shahid & Another
Law Laid Down - Evidence as to the cause of death is relevant not only in relation to the cause of death of the person making the statement but also to the circumstances of the transaction which resulted in death. In the suicide note when the prosecutrix has tried to convey that the accused were hungry (for sex) and that she became their food (victim), it clearly indicates that she was violated and that she did not want to live life of Full Judgment
Touheed Musalman Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - It is not appropriate to award ‘death sentence’ in every case. To award death sentence, some factors are necessary to be considered, such as the age of culprit, manner of commission of offence and possibilities of reformation of accused, etc. Full Judgment
Raj Kumar Kol Versus State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid dow - Fingering into the vagina would be a rape within the definition of rape under Section 375 of IPC as substituted by Act No.13 of 2013 w.e.f. 03-02-2013. Taking into consideration the totality of the facts, nature, motive and the manner of the offence, capital punishment is commuted to the Rigorous imprisonment for a period of 20 years and fine of Rs.10,000/-. Full Judgment
Mallikarjun Kodagali (Dead) represented through Legal Representatives Versus State of Karnataka & Ors.
Deepak alias Preetam Verma and Anr. Vs. State of MP & Anr.
Shehzad s/o Abdul Karim v/s Sohrab s/o Gulji and others
Gyanchand Jain Vs. State of Madhya Prdesh
Balmukund Singh Gautam Vs. Smt. Neena Vikram Verma
Kalpana Mehta and others Versus Union of India and others
Visnushankar (since dead) and others Vs. Girdharilal and others
Shri Gouri Ganesh Shri Balaji Constructions “C” Class Contractor Vs. Executive Engineer, PWD
Law Laid Down - The expression “ascertained amount” appearing in Section 2(1)(d) of the M.P. Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 (for short “the State Act”) includes the amount of consequential relief. Mere declaration of termination of contract is not the substantial relief and in the guise of mere declaration an aggrieved person cannot be permitted to omit the consequential relief which the party may be entitled to claim in a reference under the M.P. Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983. It is held that reading of Full Judgment
Hemant Rawat Vs. Smt. Anubha Rawat
Law laid down - Husband has failed to establish any reasonable excuse for withdrawal from the society of wife. He is under obligation to live with his wife in his home and under his roof. Full Judgment
Kanchedilal Thakur Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - Whether corroboration of the statement of evidence of police person is necessary or not and whether the conviction can be based on the statement of witness/witnesses recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. when the witness denied the contents of statement under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. in their deposition recorded before the Court during Trial. Full Judgment