Judgments - INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872
DR. RAJDEEP KAPOOR VS. MOHD. SARWAR KHAN AND ANOTHER
Law laid down - Evidence Act with strict technicalities is not applicable in mutation proceedings. Revenue Officer is only required to do enquiry to reach satisfaction in respect of evidence filed regarding acquisition of rights over land. Examination on oath and cross-examination need not be done by Tehsildar in mutation proceedings. Full Judgment
Jaipal Choudhary & Anr. Versus Chhattisgarh Wakf Board & Anr.
RAJNESH Versus NEHA & Anr.
Rajesh @ Sarkari & Anr. Versus State of Haryana
SHATRUGHNA BABAN MESHRAM VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
SMT. RENUKA DEY & ORS. VERSUS NARESH CHANDRA GOPE (D) THR. LRS. & ANR.
TOFAN SINGH Versus STATE OF TAMIL NADU
Smriti Madan Kansagra Versus Perry Kansagra
M/S BHANDARI ENGINEERS & BUILDERS PVT LTD VERSUS M/S MAHARIA RAJ JOINT VENTURE & ORS
ARJUN PANDITRAO KHOTKAR VERSUS KAILASH KUSHANRAO GORANTYAL AND ORS.
SOMASUNDARAM @ SOMU VERSUS THE STATE REP. BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
JAGMAIL SINGH & ANR. VERSUS KARAMJIT SINGH & ORS.
Satish Kumar Khandelwal Vs. Rajendra Jain and others
ZULFIKHAR KHAN VERSUS HABIB KHAN @ ABDUL MUJEEB KHAN & ORS
State of M.P. vs. Honey @ Kakku
Law laid down - Rape and murder of 4 1⁄2 years of girl child by the appellant. - Sentence of death imposed by the trial Court under Section 376A of IPC. - Reference answered. Rarest of rare case :- (i) Standard of 100% crime test although satisfied, criminal test of 0% was not satisfied as mandated in (Shankar Kisan Rao Khade vs . State of Maharashtra, 2013 (5) SCC 546). (ii) In order to impose sentence of death the prosecution not only has to Full Judgment
In Reference State Of Chhattisgarh Versus Ram Sona
Death sentence awarded to accused for committing rape and murder of 5½ years old girl is confirmed. In view of Section 30 of the Evidence Act, self inculpatory memorandum statement of co-accused can be read in evidence if there are other corroborative evidence against the accused. Full Judgment