Judgments - Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
SUMAN VERSUS KAILASH KUMAR
TARUN GUPTA & ORS VERSUS STATE & ANR
SOUMITRA KUMAR NAHAR VERSUS PARUL NAHAR
SAGAR GR VERSUS PREETY CHOWDHARY
Gunjesh Narayan Versus Anjali Kumari
Gunjesh Narayan Versus Anjali Kumari Full Judgment
Kumari Rinku Versus Dr. Vikram Kumar
HARPEET KAUR VERSUS AMARJEET SINGH
MUNISH KAKKAR VERSUS NIDHI KAKKAR
The fact, however,remains that the relationship appears to have deteriorated to such an extent that both parties see little good in each other, an aspect supported by the counselor’s report; though the respondent insists that she wants to stay with the appellant. In our view, this insistence is only to somehow not let a decree of divorce be passed against the respondent. This is only to frustrate the endeavour of the appellant to get a decree of divorce,completely losing sight Full Judgment
Sanjay Kumar Shrivastava Vs. Smt. Pratibha
VIPIN VERSUS BHAVNA RAJPUT
A K VERSUS S S K
Kumari Jhalak V/s. Deceased Rahul through Smt. Seema
RAJNI VERSUS VIJAY
RAM AVTAR BAIRWA VERSUS SUNITA DEVI @ SANTRA
RANJEET KAUR VERSUS SARANJEET
RATHNAMMA & ORS. VERSUS SUJATHAMMA & ORS.
In the agreement of marriage (Ex.P/1), it is only stated that both parties are of same caste and with the permission and consent of both of their fathers, they have entered into this agreement of marriage. This type of marriage is not recognized in law as Section 7 of the Act contemplates that the marriage can be solemnized in accordance with customary rites and ceremonies of either party thereto and where such rites and ceremonies include the Saptpadi, the marriage Full Judgment
JITENDRA KUMAR SHARMA VERSUS VARSHA RAWAT
R. Srinivas Kumar Versus R. Shametha
If both the parties to the marriage agree for separation permanently and/or consent for divorce, in that case, certainly both the parties can move the competent court for a decree of divorce by mutual consent. Only in a case where one of the parties do not agree and give consent, only the the powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India are required to be invoked to do the substantial Justice between the parties, considering the facts and circumstances Full Judgment
Ravinder Kaur Versus Manjeet Singh (Dead) Through Lrs.
As already noticed, the High Court,while taking note of the nature of allegations made has proceeded on the basis that there is irretrievable breakdown of the marriage. Needless to mention that irretrievable breakdown of marriage by itself is not a ground provided under the statute for seeking dissolution of marriage. Hence, merely because certain issues have been raised with regard to the same, even if it be on a misunderstanding in the instant facts, it cannot be considered as inflicting mental Full Judgment