Judgments - Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
SATYAM KHANNA & ANR VERSUS THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
GULSHAN KUMAR & ORS VERSUS THE STATE & ANR
Supreme Court of India (Single Judge)
AMRUTA BEN HIMANSHU KUMAR SHAH VERSUS HIMANSHU KUMAR PRAVINCHANDRA SHAH
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
PUNEET CHOHAN AND & ORS VERSUS STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANRRADHEY MOHAN
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
KIRTI NAGPAL VERSUS ROHIT GIRDHAR
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
RAJNESH Versus NEHA & Anr.
Tags Compensation
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Mrs Ritika Sharan Versus Mr Sujoy Ghosh
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
SATISH CHANDER AHUJA VERSUS SNEHA AHUJA
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
JITENDER KUMAR @ RAJAN VERSUS KAMLESH
Tags Divorce
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
RAJNI KANT SRIVASTAVA VERSUS KUMUDINI SRIVASTAVA & ANR
Tags Divorce
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
VENKATESH NARASIMHAN VERSUS V. SUJATHA
Tags Divorce
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
NEELAM GUPTA VS. MAHIPAL SHARAN GUPTA AND ANOTHER
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
MANPREET KAUR VERSUS HARJYOT SINGH
Tags Injunction
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Mangayakarasi Versus M. Yuvaraj
The position of law is well settled that neither the High Court in the limited scope available to it in a Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code is entitled to reappreciate the evidence nor this Court. Questions raised does not qualify as substantial questions of law when the manner in which the parties had proceeded before the Trial Court is noticed. The questions framed in fact provides scope for reappreciation of the evidence and not as Full Judgment
Tags Divorce
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)