Judgments - Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
SHAFIYA KHAN @ SHAKUNTALA PRAJAPATI VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ANR.
Smt. Geetarani Tiwari Vs. Yogesh Tiwari
Smt. Pushpa Sen vs. Manoj Sen
Law laid down - Held : Appellant-wife filed a petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act,1955 for restitution of conjugal rights after filing three different proceedings against the respondent-husband and his relatives. It cannot be said that the respondent-husband has withdrawn the company of appellant-wife without any reasonable excuse and, hence, no decree under section 9 of the Act can be granted. Full Judgment
Amit Kumar Versus Suman Beniwal
Hirdayshay Vs. Nutanbai
Law laid down - Held : 1. The husband and wife lived together only for about two years intermittently, since February, 1988 and thereafter, the husband had to either serve the notice or to take the recourse of issuance of search warrant through S.D.M. Despite making persistent efforts to persuade wife to return, she did not join the company of husband and she filed two cases against the husband, both resulted in dismissal. Thus, the intention of wife is clear i.e to Full Judgment
Smt. Nirmala Devi vs. Anil Kumar Tiwari
Law laid down - Held: Section 5 (i) and Section 11 of the Act of 1955, makes it clear that if either party has a spouse living at the time of the marriage and if such marriage is solemnized after commencement of the Act of 1955, the same is void ipso-jure. The fact that whether the other party had the knowledge of existing spouse living at the time of marriage is immaterial Section 11 of the Act of 1955 only prescribes marriages Full Judgment
MRS. NAYANIKA THAKUR MEHTA VERSUS MR. MOHIT MEHTA
Nitaben Dinesh Patel Versus Dinesh Dahyabhai Patel
Swarit Verma Vs. Kanchan Verma
Law Laid down - Provisions of Section 13-B (2) of Hindu Marriage Act 1955, is directory not mandatory and the court dealing with the matter, has jurisdiction to waive cooling-off period of six months. Full Judgment
ABHILASHA GUPTA VERSUS HARIMOHAN GUPTA
SIVASANKARAN VERSUS SANTHIMEENAL
Abhishek Pandey @ Ramji Pandey and others Versus State of Madhya Pradesh and Others
Law laid down - FIR lodged under Section 498-A of IPC and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act after coming to know that husband is going to marry another lady, alleging incidents occurred almost two years prior to the date of lodging the FIR and after filing suit for seeking decree of divorce under Section 13-A of Hindu Marriage Act. The FIR is nothing but an afterthought and counter-blast to the suit filed by the husband for seeking decree of divorce. Full Judgment