Judgments - Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
P. RADHA BAI AND ORS. VERSUS P. ASHOK KUMAR AND ANR.
Union of India VERSUS Hardy Exploration and Production (India) INC
M/s Trans Asian Shipping Services (Pvt.) Ltd. VERSUS M/s Beacon Shipping Lines Ltd. by Mr. Mohammed S. Aslam Managing Director & others
M/s. Zhejiang Bonly Elevator Guide Rail Manufacture Co. Ltd. VERSUS M/s. Jade Elevator Components
M/S SHRIRAM EPC LIMITED VERSUS RIOGLASS SOLAR SA
Jehangir D. Mehta Vs. The Real Nayak Sakh Sahkari Maryadit and Another
Law laid down - The order or decision of the arbitration council under Section 57 of the Madhya Pradesh Swayatta Sahakarita Adhiniyam, 1999 is an arbitration award and it is not a decree passed by the civil court as defined under Section 2(2) of the CPC, hence the stamp duty as required by the Schedule 1A of the Indian Stamp Act, 1889 is payable for its execution. Full Judgment
Samir Narain Bhojwani :Versus: M/s. Aurora Properties and Investments and Anr.
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr. Versus Hyundai Engineering and Construction Co. Ltd. & Ors.
M/S EMKAY GLOBAL FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD. VERSUS GIRDHAR SONDHI
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA Versus GWALIOR JHANSI EXPRESSWAY LIMITED
MEIL Prasad (JV) Versus State of Madhya Pradesh & Another
Union of India & Others vs. M/s. K. Kapoor & P.R. Mahant Khandwa
Law laid down - It is a mandatory requirement to file original or certified copy of the agreement alongwith the application under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for referring the matter for arbitration in a pending suit. Full Judgment
AMEET LALCHAND SHAH AND OTHERS Versus RISHABH ENTERPRISES AND ANOTHER
Shri Gouri Ganesh Shri Balaji Constructions “C” Class Contractor Vs. Executive Engineer, PWD
Law Laid Down - The expression “ascertained amount” appearing in Section 2(1)(d) of the M.P. Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 (for short “the State Act”) includes the amount of consequential relief. Mere declaration of termination of contract is not the substantial relief and in the guise of mere declaration an aggrieved person cannot be permitted to omit the consequential relief which the party may be entitled to claim in a reference under the M.P. Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983. It is held that reading of Full Judgment