Judgments - Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
UNION OF INDIA VERSUS M/S SIKKA ENGINEERING COMPANY
NATIONAL PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LTD. VERSUS ISHVAKOO (INDIA) PVT. LTD.
DELHI AGRICULTURAL MARKETING BOARD VERSUS M/S H R BUILDERS
Ssangyong Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd. Versus National Highways Authority of India (NHAI)
Bharat Broadband Network Limited Versus United Telecoms Limited
GARWARE WALL ROPES LTD. VERSUS COASTAL MARINE CONSTRUCTIONS & ENGINEERING LTD.
UNION OF INDIA VERSUS PARMAR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
MMTC LIMITED Vs. M/S KARAM CHAND THAPAR & BROS (COAL SALES) LTD
ALLIED MEDICAL LTD. Vs. UTTAR PRADESH HEALTH SYSTEMS STRENGTHENING PROJECT
Giriraj Garg Versus Coal India Ltd. & Ors
JAIPRAKASH ASSOCIATES LTD. (JAL) THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR VERSUS TEHRI HYDRO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INDIA LTD. (THDC) THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR
RAJASTHAN SMALL INDUSTRIES CORPORATION LIMITED VERSUS M/S GANESH CONTAINERS MOVERS SYNDICATE
M/s Lanco Amarkantak Power Ltd Versus A.P. Panda
M/S SIMPLEX INFRASTRUCTURE LTD VERSUS UNION OF INDIA
South Delhi Municipal Corporation Versus SMS AAMW Tollways Private Ltd
M/s.Anik Industries Ltd Vs. M/s.DCM Shriram Consolidated Ltd
Law laid down - [a] If the arbitration clause is contained in the annexure to the contract document and the annexure is specifically mentioned therein, then the arbitration agreement exists between the parties. [b] Sec.8 of the Act mandates a judicial authority to refer the parties to arbitration in case whether pending action is subject matter of an arbitration agreement and in such cases the judicial authority does not commit any error in disposing of the civil action while referring the Full Judgment
M/s Fives Stein India Project Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata Versus State of M.P. and others
Law laid down - 1. The expression “shall” is not conclusive to determine the provision as directory or mandatory. The Court is required to ascertain the real intention of the Legislature which will include the examination, nature and design of the statute and the consequences. 2. In all cases, failure to perform a duty within the time limit, does not render the action a nullity. Where a provision lays down a period within which the public body should perform any function, the provision Full Judgment